We Need Better Arguments to Debate Big Ethical Issues [SYNOPSIS ONLY]
In this article, Dan Fleming convincingly posits that we can contribute to euthanasia debates with better arguments. He explores different ethical and philosophical frameworks that are employed in the physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia debate: deontology, consequentialism, and virtue ethics. He also contests the assumption that only those with a religious worldview oppose euthanasia legislation.
The full article is available by subscription to The Nathaniel Report